event tile with Chinese and Japanese flags in the background; text: Development of the Sino-Japanese Relationship: After the Xi-Abe Meeting in 2018

3/27/19: The Development of Sino-Japanese Relationship After the Xi-Abe Meeting in 2018

logos of the sigur center and organization of asian studies

Wednesday, March 27, 2019

12:00 PM – 1:30 PM

Elliott School of International Affairs

Room 505

1957 E Street, NW, Washington, District Of Columbia 20052

 
event tile with Chinese and Japanese flags in the background; text: Development of the Sino-Japanese Relationship: After the Xi-Abe Meeting in 2018

The Sigur Center and the Organization of Asian Studies cordially invite you to a panel discussion on the development of the Sino-Japanese relationship after the Xi-Abe meeting in 2018.

About the Event:

Despite the fact that China and Japan have not reached agreement on the Diaoyu/Senkaku island issue, their relationship is getting warm after the cold spell since 2015. In 2018, Japanese Prime Minister Abe Shinzo visited Chinese President Xi in Beijing and reached many economic agreements. The commercial agreements reached in the meeting reflect not only the strong economic bound between Chinese and Japanese economies but also the recovery of their political relationships. What will be the geopolitical influence on the development of the Sino-Japanese relationship? Will China and Japan explore a new path in gathering consensus and controlling conflicts among neighboring countries? Join us as we examine the Sino-Japanese relationship during the period of a rising China.

The Speakers:

 

portrait of yamaguchi shinji in professional attire

Shinji Yamaguchi – Senior Research Fellow at Tokyo’s Regional Studies Department of the National Institute for Defense Studies, Visiting Scholar at the George Washington University, Specialist in Chinese politics

Mike Mochizuki, pictured in professional attire

Mike M. Mochizuki – Associate Professor of Political Science and International Affairs at George Washington University, Specialist in Japanese politics

headshot of albert keidel in professional attire

Alber Keidel – Adjunct Graduate Professor of Economics at George Washington University, Specialist in the Chinese economy

event tile with India and Pakistan flag in the background; text: Crisis in Kashmir: Escalation, Opportunity or Business as Usual?

3/21/19: Crisis in Kashmir: Escalation, Opportunity or Business as Usual?

Sigur Center logo with Asian landmark icons outline art

Thursday, March 21, 2019
12:30 PM – 1:45 PM

Room 503, Chung-Wen Shih Conference Room
The Elliott School of International Affairs
1957 E Street, NW, Washington, District Of Columbia 20052

 flyer for crisis in kashmir event

A month into the military confrontation between India and Pakistan in Kashmir set off by a suicide bombing killing 40 Indian Central Reserve Police Force members by Pakistan-based militant group Jaish-e-Mohammed, the crisis seems to have receded—or has it?

What are the ongoing threats that might re-ignite the crisis? Are there opportunities to further diffuse the situation? What are the main forces at play in Kashmir, the region and internationally that will influence these outcomes?

The Rising Powers Initiative and the Sigur Center for Asian Studies invites you to a discussion on the crisis and its aftermath.

About the Speakers:

Deepa Ollapally, pictured in professional attire

Deepa Ollapally is directing a major research project on power and identity and the worldviews of rising and aspiring powers in Asia and Eurasia. Her research focuses on domestic foreign policy debates in India and its implications for regional security and global leadership of the U.S.

Headshot of Aqab Malik in professional attire

Dr. Aqab Malik is a Fulbright visiting scholar at the Sigur Center at the Elliott School of International Affairs at George Washington University. He has previously been a visiting scholar at the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University and is currently working on a book on the geostrategic consequences of the belt and road initiative on the global transfer of power.

headshot of navnita behera wearing glasses

Navnita Behera is a reader in the department of political science at Delhi University, and the author of “State, Identity and Violence: Jammu, Kashmir, and Ladakh” (Manohar Publishers, 2000). She has been a visiting scholar at the Brookings Institution and has published extensively on South Asia.

Emmanuel Teitelbaum, pictured in professional attire

Emmanuel Teitelbaum is assistant professor of political science and international affairs at George Washington University. His research examines the political roots of class conflict and the foundations of class compromise. His articles have appeared in leading journals, including World Politics, Comparative Political Studies, Political Research Quarterly, PS: Political Science & Politics, the Journal of Development Studies and Critical Asian Studies. His forthcoming book, Managing Dissent: Government Responses to Industrial Conflict in Post-Reform South Asia, explores the dynamics of state-labor relations and industrial conflict following the implementation of neoliberal economic reforms.

event flyer with background of Japanese city after an earthquake; text: Lessons Learned & Unlearned: Media Coverage of the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake

3/5/2019: Lessons Learned & Unlearned: Media Coverage of the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake

Sigur Center logo with line art of Asian landmarks

Tuesday, March 5, 2019
12:30 PM – 1:45 PM

Chung-wen Shih Conference Room, Suite 503
Elliott School of International Affairs
1957 E Street, NW, Washington, District Of Columbia 20052

event flyer with background of Japanese city after an earthquake; text: Lessons Learned & Unlearned: Media Coverage of the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake

About the Event:

It has been almost eight years since Japan suffered from the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami, and nuclear meltdown at Fukushima Daiichi plant in March 2011. What lessons have news media learned since then and how are they preparing for another highly possible huge disaster in a very seismic country? Professor Okumura is presenting based off of comprehensive and in-depth interview projects with newsroom executives at fourteen Japanese mainstream national media outlets. The findings reveal Japanese media’s weak journalism practice particularly in the early stages of the disaster, as well as their stagnation to remain in print and broadcasting rather than developing their capabilities on the internet and smartphone platforms. He extends his analysis to the implications on public trust toward media and the government, and the possible impact on Japanese society as well as Japan’s relations with the world in the case of another huge disaster.

portrait of nobuyuki okumura in professional attire

About the Speaker:

Nobuyuki Okumura is currently a Fulbright visiting scholar at the Sigur Center for Asian Studies. He is also a professor at Musashi University in Tokyo.He was originally a news producer/reporter at TV Asahi covering mainly covering politics and diplomacy. He has been actively covering various issues in journalism since he started his academic career as a professor at Ritsumeikan University in Kyoto in 2005. His research topics range from journalism storytelling to telecommunication policy and he has been contributing various web news sites. He holds an M.A. degree from Sophia University in International Relations. He was also awarded the Fulbright Journalist Program award in 2002-03 and conducted research at SAIS, Johns Hopkins University.

 

Satellite image of the Korean peninsula

11/8/2018: North Korea after the 2018 Panmunjeom, Singapore and Pyongyang Summits: New and Unchanged

Sigur Center logo with transparent background
Satellite image of the Korean peninsula

Thursday, November 8, 2018 12:00 PM – 2:00 PM

Lindner Commons, Room 602
The Elliott School of International Affairs
1957 E Street, NW
Washington, DC 20052

Partnerships for International Strategies in Asia (PISA) and the Sigur Center for Asian Studies  invite you to a lecture by Dr. Sergei Kurbanov about North Korea following the 2018 Panmunjeom, Singapore, and Pyongyang summits. Lunch will be provided and the event is free and open to the public.

This event is public and open to the media.

 

headshot of Sergei Kurbanov in professional attire

About the Speaker:

Dr. Sergei Kurbanov is a professor and the chair of the newly established Department of Korean Studies at St. Petersburg University. In 2017 – 2018 he was a visiting scholar at the George Washington Institute for Korean Studies. In 1997, he developed and opened the “Korean History Major” BA Program. His spheres of interest are wide, including the general history of Korea (with books published in 2002,2009 and 2018), Korean Confucianism (book in 2007), and the everyday lives of North and South Koreans in 1987 – 2000s (books in 2013 and 2017). He also wrote and compiled a biography (published in 2016) of Kim Gu, the head of the Provisional government of the Republic of Korea in China, as well as a book on the theory of historical science (book in 2016).

Singapore War Memorial at night with moon above it in the sky

11/1/18: Possibilities for Peace in the Long Postwar: Evolving Directions for WWII Memory in China, Singapore, and Japan

sigur center logo with transparent background

Thursday, November 1, 2018 1:00 PM – 2:15 PM

Chung-wen Shih Conference Room, Suite 503

The Elliott School of International Affairs

1957 E Street, NW

Washington, DC 20052

Image of the civilian war memorial in Singapore

The Sigur Center for Asian Studies  invite you to a discussion with Ms. Julia Lau – former lecturer at Georgetown University, The Catholic University of America, and McDaniel College in Westminster, MD. – to discuss her research into war memory in Southeast Asia and China.

Light refreshments will be available. This event is public, but off the record and not for attribution to allow for candid discussion of Ms. Lau’s research.

About the Event:

 

This lecture examines questions and themes on war memory pertaining to Japanese Imperial Army actions in World War II on the Pacific front, including the Nanjing Massacre and the Occupation of Singapore. Building on book research and the speaker’s personal and field visits to war memorials and sites, museums, and other commemorative locations in China and Singapore, as well as the examination of a small selection of history textbooks for school children of both countries, the lecture focuses on the primary puzzle of why war memory differs in its tenor and expression in China and Singapore, despite similarities in the deprivations and suffering of their civilians during the war. A secondary question is how this affects Sino-Japanese relations and Singapore’s bilateral ties with Tokyo today. Some new directions might be emerging with regard to how younger citizens of China (including the Chinese diaspora) and Singapore who have no direct or received experience of the war or Occupation are finding ways to reconcile their views on Japanese actions in WWII, while juggling conflicting tensions between nationalism and pacifist globalism or regionalism.

Specific sites of war memory discussed include the Museum of the War of Chinese People’s Resistance Against Japanese Aggression in Wanping, China; the Japanese Cemetery in Singapore; Yasukuni Shrine and the Yushukan War Museum in Tokyo, and various other war-related sites and memorials. This lecture also draws upon working papers that the speaker has presented at past conferences, including the annual conference of the Association for Asian Studies and its regional conferences.

 

Julia M. Lau posing for a picture on a sunny day by a waterfront

About the Speaker:

Julia M. Lau is now an independent scholar and writer based in Phoenix, AZ. A native of Singapore, she attended the National University of Singapore and Georgetown University, and has graduate degrees in law, security studies, and government. She has taught as a lecturer at Georgetown University, The Catholic University of America, and McDaniel College in Westminster, MD. Her current research interests include war memory in Southeast Asia and China, and gender politics. She is also a member of the American Political Science Association’s status committee on Contingent Faculty, advocating for better working conditions and understanding of contingent and adjunct faculty in the political science profession.

portrait of Ronald Spector in professional attire

About the Moderator:

Professor Ronald Spector received his B.A. from Johns Hopkins and his MA and Ph.D. from Yale. He has served in various government positions and on active duty in the Marine Corps from 1967-1969 and 1983-1984, and was the first civilian to become Director of Naval History and the head of the Naval Historical Center. He has served on the faculties of LSU, Alabama and Princeton and has been a senior Fulbright lecturer in India and Israel. In 1995-1996 he was Distinguished Visiting Professor of Strategy at the National War College and was the Distinguished Guest Professor at Keio University, Tokyo in 2000. At the Elliott School, Spector offers undergraduate and graduate courses on US-East Asia Relations, World War II, and the Vietnam War as well as a graduate seminar on Naval history and one on strategy.

Image above: The Civilian War Memorial, Singapore, by moonlight. Original photo.

11/7/18: US Post-war Settlement with Japan: The Korean Perspective

Sigur Center logo with transparent background
GW Institute for Korean Studies logo

Wednesday, November 7, 2018 12:30 PM – 1:45 PM

Room 505
The Elliott School of International Affairs
1957 E Street, NW
Washington, DC 20052

satellite view of japan and korea

 

The Sigur Center for Asian Studies  and the GW Institute for Korean Studies invite you to a discussion with Dr. Woondo Choi – currently a Visiting Scholar with the Sigur Center – to discuss Korean strategic and historical perspectives regarding the US-Japan post-war settlement.

Light refreshments will be available. This event is public and open to the media.

About the Event:

In several aspects, the Korea-Japan friendship is constrained by the mutual lack of confidence whose root originates from the history. This relationship breeds negative impacts on the tri-lateral cooperation among the US, Korea and Japan. Understanding the beginning of the US-Japan relationship would make current Japanese foreign policy more transparent, deepen the historical reconciliation between Japan and Korea, and provide clues for the US role in improving the relationship between the two allied partners. For that purpose, we will look into the three frequently-mentioned factors in the US Post-war settlement with Japan: 1) strategic interests, 2) decision-making participants’ view on Japan and 3) safety assurances vis-a-vis Japan’s military resurgence. This research will deal with the period starting with the attack on Pearl Harbor until the end of the Occupation and San Francisco Peace Treaty.

 

About the Speaker:

headshot of Woondo Choi in professional attire

Woondo Choi is a research fellow at the Institute of Korea-Japan Relations at Northeast Asian History Foundation, Seoul, Korea, at which he has been working since 2008. He received his B.A. from Yonsei University in 1987 and Ph.D. from University of Colorado, Boulder in 1997. For 1 year between 2011 and 2012, he stayed in Japan as a Visiting Professor, at Nagasaki University, Japan, and in 2018, at the Sigur Center of the George Washington University as a Visiting Scholar. He has published more than 50 articles and book chapters on Japanese foreign policy, US-Japan security relations, territorial disputes, and historical reconciliation. His recent works include “East Asian Community, the Japanese Policy Suggestion: Tracking the Changes in Japan’s Regional Perception.” (2012), “Japan’s Right for Self-Defense: Concept, Interpretation, and Constitutional Revision” (2013) “Abe’s Visit to Yasukuni Shrine and the Impact on East Asian Regional Security” (2014.), “Korean Independence and 70 Years Thereafter: Japanese Colonial Rule and Post-War Settlement” (2015).

 

 

headshot of Ben Hopkins in professional attireModerated by:

Benjamin D. Hopkins – Director, Sigur Center for Asian Studies; Associate Professor of History and International Affairs

 

 

Map of Taiwan

11/27/18 The Tondu Question: Understanding Taiwanese Preferences on Determining National Future

Sigur Center logo with transparent background

Tuesday, November 27, 2018 12:30 PM – 1:45 PM

Chung-wen Shih Conference Room – Suite 503
The Elliott School of International Affairs
1957 E Street, NW
Washington, DC 20052

collage of Trump, Tsai Ing-wen, and Xi Jinping

The Sigur Center for Asian Studies cordially invites you to a discussion with Mr. Fang Yu Chen – a Non-Resident Scholar affiliated with the Sigur Center – to discuss Taiwanese views regarding national future and to explore government responses to these views.

Light refreshments will be available. This event is public and open to the media.

About the Event:

With the dynamic shifts and changes in the U.S.-China relationship, Taiwan has been thrust in the spotlight of international politics. On the one hand, China is increasingly mounting pressure on governments and private corporations to adhere to its “One China Principle.” On the other hand, preserving Taiwan’s democracy and freedom have been identified as important elements to U.S. policy and values, as outlined in U.S. National Security Strategy and echoed by recent remarks made by U.S. Vice President Mike Pence.

However, how do the Taiwanese view China’s One China Principle and, conversely, the “One China policy” of the United States? What are citizen preferences on determining national future, whether it be independence, unification, or maintenance of the status quo? Although Taiwanese identity has been a growing force within Taiwan politics, support for “Taiwan independence” may seem to be waning. What does “maintaining status quo” fully mean and imply, given that this selection is a popular recurring option in surveys on the subject?

In fact, there are various interpretations of “status quo” and even multiple meanings of Taiwan independence. Using a recently collected dataset based on a new approach of measurements, this talk aims to disentangle the varieties of Tondu (統獨, unification/independence) – illustrating the propositions of different types of pro-independence, pro-unification, and status quo; and estimate the proportions of each category in public opinion. The talk will also discuss how the tondu preferences influence the results of the local elections in Taiwan, especially the rise (and fall?) of Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-Je.

 

 

About the Speaker:

Picture of Fang Yu Chen in professional attireMr. Fang Yu Chen is a PhD candidate in Political Science at Michigan State University. His research interests include authoritarian politics, political behaviors, inequality, and nationalism. Mr. Chen’s dissertation topic is “Ruling Party Institutionalization in East Asian Authoritarian Regimes,” in which he will compare former dictators’ ruling parties in Taiwan, South Korea, Indonesia, and the Philippines. Since 2014, he became the co-founder and co-editor of the website “Who Governs TW,” which aims to become a Mandarin version of the Monkey Cage. Currently, he lives in the DC area.

headshot of catherine craven in white shirt

05/07/18: Locating the Global Politics of Diaspora Engagement: Engaging Tamils in Development in Toronto–A Discussion with Visiting Scholar Catherine Craven

Monday, May 7, 2018

12:00 PM – 1:15 PM

Chung-wen Shih Conference Room, Suite 503

The Elliott School of International Affairs

1957 E St. NW,  Washington, DC 20052

person standing at a pier looking out into the city

Recent decades have seen an increase in the adoption of diaspora engagement strategies by states, but also by a more complex global network of non-state governance actors, including the World Bank, NGOs and the private sector. Interestingly, as diaspora engagement is ‘globalized’, it also tends to become depoliticised. Especially in the field of international development diaspora engagement is now overwhelmingly framed as an operational strategy or management tool. And yet, far from an apolitical best practice, diaspora engagement in any policy field necessarily produces hierarchies within and among diaspora groups, and it can create and reify oppressive and exclusionary categories related to diasporas and migrants more widely (the terrorist, or the “model minority”, for example). The politics of diaspora engagement thus deserve critical attention. However, existing scholarship has tended to bracket either the global dynamics or the local context of such politics. In contrast, my thesis proposes to locate the global politics of diaspora engagement in the realm of practice. Practices embody political struggles informed by the hierarchical distribution of capital within emergent global social fields, which I conceptualize as assemblages.

Based on 6 months of multi-method fieldwork, the presentation will focus on mapping the practices of my first case study, the engagement of the Tamil diaspora for development in Toronto. The mapping suggests a complex interplay of global and local practices – both by the diaspora and the engagers – that are deeply intertwined with the places of engagement. Preliminary analysis of the prevalence of certain practices suggests that both social capital (in the form of elite professional networks and the ability to scale jump), and cultural capital (informed by both UN sustainable development norms, and Canadian national identity) significantly shape the politics of diaspora engagement in this context.

This event is free and open to the public.

About the Speaker:

headshot of catherine craven in white shirt

Catherine Craven is a PhD Candidate in the Department of Politics and International Studies at SOAS, University of London and currently a visiting scholar at the Sigur Center for Asian Studies inside the Elliott School of International Affairs at GW. Funded by the UK Economic and Social Research Council, her research explores the global and local politics of diaspora engagement in governance through the lens of Tamil diasporans. She has also been a visiting scholar at York University’s Centre for Asian Research, a research associate at the Free University of Berlin’s collaborative research centre (SFB 700) ‘Governance in Areas of Limited Statehood’, and a research assistant at the Global Public Policy Institute. She received her MSc in Global Politics from the London School of Economics, and her BA in Anthropology from the University of Sussex. Her research interests include globalization and global governance, cities, diasporas and transnationalism, practice theory and post-positive thinking in political science.

black and white photo of a group of people sitting and standing together

03/28/18: Early Photography of the Silk Road: A Discussion with Visiting Scholar Maeve Nolan

Audio Recording Part 1

Audio Recording Part 2

Audio Recording Part 3

 

 

black and white image of a stage play

 

Part of the Sigur Center’s Visiting Scholar Roundtable Series

Wednesday, March 28, 2018
12:00 PM – 1:30 PM
Chung-wen Shih Conference Room
The Elliott School of International Affairs
1957 E Street, NW, Suite 503
Washington, DC 20052

 

Early photography of the Silk Road is a sub-genre of early photography. These photographs have contributed significantly to the Western world’s vision of the Silk Road and Asia but they have yet to be studied in depth. This talk explains what early Silk Road photography looks like, its origins, who produced it and why.

This event is on the record and open to the media.

About the speaker:

profile picture of maeve nolan in black clothing outdoorsMaeve Nolan is a second year PhD Art History and Archeology student at the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. She is currently a visiting scholar with George Washington University’s Sigur Center whilst she conducts her research at the National Geographic Society. The title of her PhD is:

“Early Silk Road photography: A case study of how and why Dr. Maynard Owen Williams, Litt. D. (1888-1963) photographed the Silk Road during the Citroen-Haardt Trans-Asiatic Expedition (1931-1932)”

Her PhD examines early photography of the Silk Road through a close analysis of the work of one of the last of the early Silk Road photographers, Maynard Owen Williams (1888-1963). She has chosen Williams’ photographs of the Citroen-Haardt Trans-Asiatic Expedition (1931-1932), which re-traced the route of Marco Polo, as a case study. These photographs present some of the most technically proficient, romantic, painterly and widely distributed examples of early Silk Road photography and appeared alongside articles Williams wrote for the influential American publication, the National Geographic Magazine.

Through her research, she intends to shed light on this overlooked photographic genre and help to deepen understanding of its impact on the Western world’s relationship with and understanding of Asia and the Silk Road.